Even
as the Supreme Court has placed restrictions on the use of Section
498A of the Indian Penal Code, it is a weapon that wives like to use
against husbands during a marriage breakdown
Illustration by Amit Bandre; PR Gokul
By
Shevlin Sebastian
When
IT professional Manesh Nair and his parents saw the profile on a
matrimony website, they felt Soumya would be a suitable bride. The
caste and community matched and later the horoscopes, too. So, there
was no problem in any way. When the pair met for the first time,
Manesh liked Soumya. And apparently, so did Soumya.
The
marriage took place in September, 2012. The couple went to live in
Chennai where Manesh worked. “Right from the beginning, Soumya
showed a reluctance to have any sexual contact,” he says. “She
stated that she did not want children immediately, and insisted that
I use a contraceptive. It seemed she was not interested in having a
relationship.”
Manesh
felt puzzled and a bit depressed too. Then he began to get
suspicious. So, he looked into her resume once again. “Soumya told
me that she was working as a chartered accountant in a company at
Coimbatore,” says Manesh. “But when I called the firm they said
they had no employee by the name of Soumya. Further investigations
revealed that she had not even done a chartered accountancy course.
My father-in-law was supposed to be the general manager of a company.
But that turned out to be false. He had printed a fake visiting
card.”
Things
went from bad to worse. Within months, Soumya said Manesh and his
father had stolen her jewellery. “This was absolutely untrue,”
says Manesh. Then she alleged physical violence and filed a complaint
under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Manesh had no option but
to file for divorce. Because his in-laws had filed a case against his
father, the latter had to go to court often. “My father has led a
life of integrity,” says Manesh. “Now he was being harassed by my
wife’s family.”
Soumya’s
family wanted Rs 50 lakh as alimony. Then they raised it to Rs 80
lakh. “My life has been a hell for the past six years,” says the
Kochi-based Manesh. “And I go through a lot of tension because of
Section 498 A [of the Indian Penal Code].”
The
law goes like this: 'Whoever, being the husband or the relative of a
woman, subjects such a woman to cruelty shall be punished with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall be
liable to pay a fine. The offence is cognisable, non-compoundable and
non-bailable.'
Businessman
Anil Menon, who has had an acrimonious divorce, says, “Section 498
A is a tool that has been misused by women.”
Another
one who has suffered is the Thiruvananthapuram-based Soman Nallapat.
Frequent verbal spats with his wife, Revathi, caused her to file for
divorce. She filed a case under Section 498 A of, citing cruelty by
her husband and lodged an FIR.
One
morning, at 6 am, the police came and arrested Soman. “My
reputation has been destroyed, in the area I live,” he says. Soman
spent a day in the lock-up before the bail application came through.
Soman,
who works as a chartered accountant in a reputed firm, had bought an
apartment in which his wife and he were the co-owners. “But
Revathi's parents insisted the apartment be given over to her.
Eventually, to buy peace, I did so.” The couple has a
seven-year-old daughter.
But
now times are changing. “There have been changes in the
interpretation and enforcement because of certain judgements by the
Supreme Court,” says lawyer Deepak George.
In
September, 2017, a two-member bench comprising Justices A K Goel and
U U Lalit stated that every complaint under Section 498A of the IPC
received by the police or the magistrate had to be looked into by a
three-member family welfare committee. The committee members can
interact with the duelling couple, personally or through phone or
e-mail.
Only
after the committee submits a report, within a month, can any action
be taken. “No longer is a husband arrested as soon as a complaint
is filed,” says Sunil.
But
P R Gopal, the secretary of the NGO Purushavaksa Samrakshana Samithi,
says, “The problem is that the system can be bent because the
police are corrupt. So, an arrest can be done.”
Meanwhile,
Anil says, with a touch of wit, “It is better to take dowry. In
case, the marriage does not work out, you can return the money, which
is hers, rather than give some of yours.”
(Some
names have been changed)
Fighting
for the male gender
The
NGO Purushavaksa Samrakshana Samithi was set up in 2011. This is part
of an umbrella group of the 'Save Indian Family', which works against
the misuse of women protection laws. “We do legal counselling for
harassed husbands,” says secretary P R Gokul. “Then we submit
appeals and memorandums, on behalf of husbands, to government
departments. I believe husband harassment has gone down thanks to the
work done by members of our NGO as well as the 'Save Indian Family'.”
Gokul
is not a fan of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. “In this
section, only the rights of wives are protected,” he says. “I
believe both husband and wife should have rights, not just the wife.
All human beings should be protected. So, this act is principally
wrong. And from my experience, about 95 per cent of the time the
allegations made by the wife against the husband are false. Too many
women are misusing the law.”
(The
New Indian Express, Kochi and Thiruvananthapuram)
#Section498A
#IndianPenalCode #husbandharassment #AKGoel #UULalit
No comments:
Post a Comment